Japan Spouse Visa Requirements: 6 Key Approval Factors (2026 Guide)

The Japan Spouse Visa (officially, the "Spouse or Child of Japanese National" status of residence) is the status of residence a foreign national in a legal marriage with a Japanese citizen needs in order to live in Japan. Once you obtain this status, you can work and engage in activities in Japan without employment restrictions.

As the words "or Child" in the name indicate, this status is not limited to spouses. It also covers biological children of Japanese nationals (including acknowledged children born out of wedlock; ordinary adopted children are not included) and children of Japanese nationals by special adoption. This article focuses on the "spouse" case, which generates by far the most consultations.

Depending on your situation, you will file one of three types of applications:

• Certificate of Eligibility (COE) Application — Filed to bring your spouse to Japan when they are currently overseas
• Change of Status of Residence — When your spouse is already in Japan and switching from another status (such as Student or Engineer / Specialist in Humanities / International Services (the work visa))
• Extension of Period of Stay — When your spouse already holds a spouse visa and the expiration date is approaching

The periods of stay defined for the spouse visa are 5 years, 3 years, 1 year, or 6 months.

The factors the Immigration Services Agency of Japan (ISA) examines when reviewing this status can be organized into 6 broad areas. In recent years there has been a steady stream of reviews and revisions to the systems and practices surrounding residence screening for foreign nationals, and much of the information online is out of date. This article is based on the latest information as of July 2026, explained in detail under the supervision of a certified administrative scrivener.

---

Factor 1: A Legal Marriage Must Be Established

To apply for a spouse visa, a legally valid marriage must be established. This is the prerequisite that takes priority over every other condition — without it, your application cannot even reach the review table.

Common-law or de facto relationships do not qualify

Under the Immigration Control Act, a "spouse of a Japanese national" means a person who is in a legally registered marriage and currently married. You cannot apply for a spouse visa while merely cohabiting (a common-law or de facto relationship) or while engaged. A person whose marriage has ended through the spouse's death or through divorce also no longer qualifies as a "spouse."

Previous marriages must be legally dissolved

If either the Japanese or foreign partner has a previous marriage, its divorce procedures must be legally complete. If the previous marriage has not been dissolved, the new marriage cannot be validly established, as it would constitute bigamy.

Special considerations for international marriages

For international marriages, submitting the marriage registration at a Japanese municipal office may not be enough — marriage procedures may also be required in the foreign spouse's home country. Requirements vary by country, so it is important to check with the relevant embassy or consulate in advance.

A legal marriage is only the "entrance"

Keep in mind that establishing the legal marriage is merely the entrance to the review. Even where a legal marriage exists, this status will not be granted if the marriage lacks the substance of a genuine married life as socially understood — living together, cooperating, and supporting each other. How this "substance" is verified is explained in detail under Factor 3 (authenticity of marriage) and Factor 6 (cohabitation).

---

Factor 2: A History of Immigration Violations Is a Severe Disadvantage

If the foreign spouse has a history of violations of the Immigration Control Act, the spouse visa review becomes very strict. Depending on the type and circumstances of the violation, applying may not even be possible.

Deportation (removal) history

If you have previously been removed from Japan, entry into Japan is in principle not permitted during the re-entry ban period. The length of the ban depends on how the departure occurred, in three tiers:

• Departure under the departure order system — 1 year
• Deportation — 5 years
• Deportation with a prior deportation history — 10 years

In addition, for certain serious criminal histories — drug offenses, or imprisonment of one year or more for certain crimes — there are categories of indefinite entry denial, with no expiration through the passage of time.

Even after a re-entry ban period has passed, the violation history itself is still weighed as a negative factor in the review. This is a practical tendency, but if you have a violation history you should assume you will need to prove the authenticity of the marriage and your livelihood foundations with more care than usual.

Overstay history

If you are currently overstaying, the normal application procedures are not available. You would need to consider voluntarily reporting to immigration and seeking Special Permission to Stay. A past overstay (already resolved) is also weighed as a negative factor in the review.

Unauthorized work (activities outside permitted status)

Engaging in unauthorized work activities is treated as a serious negative factor in immigration reviews. Exceeding the part-time work limit for students (28 hours per week) can also fall into this category.

Criminal record

A criminal record, whether in Japan or abroad, is a serious disadvantage in the review. The type and severity of the offense and the years elapsed are all weighed comprehensively.

---

Factor 3: Authenticity of Marriage Is Weighted Most Heavily

In the spouse visa review, proving the authenticity of the marriage is the most important point of all. The ISA's greatest concern is: "Is this a sham marriage entered into to obtain a status of residence?" It therefore verifies the authenticity of the marriage from many angles.

The official verification mechanism: the "Questionnaire" and snapshot photos

The first thing to understand is that the ISA verifies this point through official required documents. COE and change-of-status applications as a spouse require submission of the ISA-prescribed "Questionnaire" (shitsumonsho). The Questionnaire asks in detail about how you met, whether an introducer or introduction agency was involved, the course of your relationship, whether you held a wedding ceremony, whether your relatives know about the marriage, the language you use as a couple, divorce history, travel history, and more. You are also required to submit snapshot photos of the two of you together.

In other words, "what immigration looks at" is written right into the Questionnaire's own questions. Consistency — that the statements in your application form, Questionnaire, and supporting evidence do not contradict one another — is also emphasized. Contradictions between documents are a major trigger for suspicion of falsehood.

Practical evaluation tendencies — these are "rules of thumb" only

Below we discuss specific figures for relationship length, number of meetings, and so on. All of them are practical rules of thumb drawn from experience, not standards published by the ISA. Reviews weigh each case's individual circumstances comprehensively: falling below a benchmark does not automatically mean denial, and meeting one is no guarantee of safety.

Length of relationship

The length of your relationship is one of the basic indicators for assessing authenticity (the tiers below are practical rules of thumb).

• 2 years or more of dating tends to be evaluated as showing a well-established relationship
• 6 months to 2 years is within the ordinary range and unlikely to raise issues
• Less than 3 months may be judged high-risk

That said, the relationship's length alone does not decide the review. Even a short relationship can sometimes be offset by sufficient proof of authenticity in other areas.

Number of in-person meetings

Especially for long-distance international relationships, the number of times you have met in person is an important evaluation element (the tiers are practical rules of thumb).

• 10 or more meetings, or experience living together, makes a favorable impression
• 5 to 9 meetings is the standard range
• 3 to 4 meetings may be judged somewhat few
• 1 to 2 meetings carries a high risk of being suspected as a sham

Online interaction (LINE, video calls, etc.) can serve as supplementary evidence, but it is no substitute for having met in person.

Communication ability

Communication between spouses is the foundation of a marriage. The Questionnaire itself asks about "the language used in conversation between the couple" (the tendencies below are practical rules of thumb).

• Full daily conversation in a shared language poses no problem
• Basic conversation level is rarely a major problem, but calls for more careful supporting evidence
• No shared language, relying solely on translation apps risks raising the question, "Can they genuinely communicate?"

How you met

How you met is also verified through the Questionnaire (the tendencies below are practical rules of thumb).

• Meeting at work or school makes a favorable impression as a natural encounter
• Introduction by friends or acquaintances is likewise an ordinary way to meet and poses no problem
• Dating apps and online matchmaking sites are now recognized as common ways to meet, and rarely pose a problem in themselves
• Meeting via marriage agencies or introduction brokers requires caution. Because these have been used as channels for sham marriages, the ISA tends to review such cases more carefully

Age difference

An age difference exceeding 20 years does not by itself lead to denial, but combined with other risk factors it tends to invite suspicion of a sham marriage (a practical rule of thumb). For example, a large age gap combined with a short relationship and few in-person meetings requires particular caution.

Preparing evidence is the key

Preparing evidence to prove the authenticity of your marriage is a decisive point that can shape the outcome of the review.

• Photos of the two of you taken at different times and places (trips, meals, events, etc.)
• Message records from LINE, Messenger, or other apps (showing regular daily interaction)
• Travel records (passport stamps, flight booking confirmations, etc.)
• Remittance records (if you have been sending living expenses)
• Letters or cards exchanged between you (if any)

Having almost no photos together is a major risk that invites doubt about the reality of your marriage. Also, if your photos are all selfies, you may be suspected of having "taken them in a batch for the application" — so ideally, prepare photos from a variety of times and settings that include third parties such as family and friends.

Introduction to families

Having introduced each other to both families is strong evidence that the marriage is socially recognized (the Questionnaire also asks whether your relatives know about the marriage). Introduction to only one family is better than none, but having met neither family is a risk factor.

Wedding ceremony or celebration meal

Holding a wedding ceremony is not mandatory, but a ceremony attended by relatives makes a favorable impression. Even a dinner gathering or party is evaluated more positively than "nothing at all." Especially where other risk factors are present, "not even having held a ceremony" can work as an additional negative.

Watch out for divorce history

Divorce history tends to attract particularly close scrutiny from the ISA in the following cases:

• The foreign spouse has a prior divorce from a Japanese national — Easily raises suspicion that the previous marriage was a sham for obtaining a status of residence
• The Japanese spouse has multiple prior divorces from foreign nationals — Risks suspicion of repeated involvement in sham marriages

---

Factor 4: Demonstrating Your Household's Financial Capacity

The spouse visa review also examines whether you have the financial capacity to lead a stable life in Japan. The perspective is: "After entering Japan, will this person fall into financial hardship and end up relying on public assistance (welfare)?" For COE applications in particular, the ISA's published practice makes explicit that cases involving a "risk of becoming a public burden" — such as delinquent taxes or social insurance premiums — are judged cautiously.

The documents officially required

What is officially required to prove financial capacity is the Japanese spouse's (i.e., the household breadwinner's) resident tax taxation (or exemption) certificate and tax payment certificate (most recent 1 year, showing total income and payment status). If circumstances such as a recent return to Japan or relocation make it impossible to prove capacity with these documents, you supplement them with copies of bank passbooks, a certificate of employment, and the like.

No codified income threshold exists

An important premise: for the spouse visa, no explicit income threshold published by the ISA exists. Every figure given below is a practical rule of thumb, not a published standard — please keep this in mind.

With that said, the following formula is often used as a practical benchmark:

Household income benchmark = roughly ¥2,500,000 + roughly ¥500,000 × number of dependents

For example, with no dependents (a couple only), roughly ¥2,500,000 is often cited as the benchmark; with one child, roughly ¥3,000,000.

Financial capacity is judged on a household basis. The Japanese spouse's income is the core, but the foreign spouse's income is also counted in the evaluation. An arrangement where the Japanese spouse is a full-time homemaker and the foreign spouse supports the household is not a problem under the system as such. However, in COE applications (where the foreign spouse is still overseas), the foreign spouse's "expected income from work in Japan" is treated as an uncertain element and, in practice, tends not to be weighted highly.

If your income falls below the benchmark

Even if your income falls below the benchmark above, the following may help compensate:

• Savings — In practice, savings of roughly ¥2,000,000 or more are often said to be effective material for offsetting an income shortfall (this too is a practical rule of thumb, not a published standard)
• An additional guarantor — Having a financially capable relative or similar person serve as an additional guarantor can ease concerns about your finances
• Explaining your livelihood plan in a statement of reasons — Concretely explaining your expected future income and life plans can supplement the numbers on paper

On the other hand, if your income falls far below the benchmark, you have little savings, and no additional guarantor is available, the risk of denial rises.

---

Factor 5: Taxes, Pension, and Health Insurance — How Payment Records Are Reviewed, and the New Mechanism Coming in 2027

Fulfillment of public obligations — taxes, pension, and health insurance — has been a consideration in residence reviews all along. In COE screening, the ISA's published practice makes explicit that cases involving a "risk of becoming a public burden," such as delinquent taxes or social insurance premiums, are judged cautiously, and the required documents include the resident tax payment certificate (most recent 1 year). In other words, non-payment has been a clear negative factor for years.

Moreover, in June 2025, the government's "Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform 2025" set out a policy of making effective use of tax and social insurance delinquency information in residence screening. Following this, the weight of public obligations in reviews is set to increase further going forward. Details below.

The three public obligations verified in the review

• Payment status of resident tax
• Payment status of National Pension / Employees' Pension
• Payment status of National Health Insurance / employee social insurance

The basic approach is to go into your application with no outstanding payments in any of these three.

• Past delays, now fully paid — Not an automatic denial, but can still count as a negative factor
• Pension exemption or deferral already applied for — An exemption or deferral obtained through proper procedures is not immediately evaluated as a negative (though the evaluation is case by case)
• For COE applications — The Japanese spouse's payment status is the primary subject of evaluation

Planned to start June 2027: delinquency data linked directly into residence screening

The government is preparing to introduce, from June 2027, a mechanism that uses delinquency information for National Health Insurance premiums and similar obligations in status-of-residence screening, under which those with delinquencies would in principle not be granted extensions or changes of status (announced by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare in November 2025). The plan is to link municipal and immigration systems so that payment status can be queried during screening.

However, note the following:

• The mechanism's concrete criteria — the thresholds for the duration, amount, and egregiousness of delinquency, and any exception rules — have not been published at this time
• Media reports suggest the main targets will be egregious cases such as long-term or large-amount delinquency or ignoring payment demands, rather than accidental missed payments — but this too is not a confirmed standard

There is no need for excessive anxiety, but it is certain that the structural risk of "reaching your extension or change of status with delinquencies left unaddressed" is heading upward.

What you can do now

• If you have unpaid amounts, pay them in full before applying
• Keep your payment records and receipts
• If you fell behind due to unavoidable circumstances such as illness or unemployment, prepare materials that can explain those circumstances
• If payment is difficult, do not leave it unattended — consult your municipality or pension office early and take the formal reduction/deferral procedures

If you have permanent residency in view

Many spouse visa holders have permanent residence permission in view down the road. In the permanent residency review, an even stricter standard applies to public obligations (the October 2025 guideline revision made explicit that payments must have been made "by their deadlines"). Getting your payment record in order from the spouse visa stage is the best possible preparation for a future permanent residency application. For details, see our permanent residency guide.

---

Factor 6: Make Your Cohabitation Plans Clear

The spouse visa is premised on living together with your Japanese spouse. The review verifies whether a shared married life — the substance of the marriage — is actually being lived, or whether you genuinely plan to live together as a couple after entry.

How cohabitation status is evaluated

• Already living together — The most favorable situation (for change-of-status or extension applications)
• Plan to live together immediately after entry (housing secured) — No problem. Being able to show a concrete address matters
• Plan to find housing after entry — Somewhat unfavorable; may give an impression of insufficient preparation
• Living apart (with a reasonable ground) — Where there is a reasonable ground such as a work posting away from home, cases with a proper explanation can be acceptable
• Living apart (no particular reason) — High risk of being judged as a marriage "lacking substance," with a substantially higher chance of denial

Long-term separation can even trigger revocation of your status

The importance of cohabitation has a statutory basis. A person residing under the "Spouse or Child of Japanese National" status who fails to engage in the activities of a spouse (a shared married life) for a continuous period of 6 months or more may be subject to revocation of their status of residence, except where there is a justifiable reason (Article 22-4, Paragraph 1, Item 7 of the Immigration Control Act).

Where there is a justifiable reason — a work posting away from home, ongoing separation mediation, and the like — the status is not immediately revoked, but you should understand that long-term separation goes to the very core of this status of residence.

Divorce or bereavement must be reported within 14 days

Also, if you divorce or lose your spouse, you must notify immigration within 14 days (Article 19-16, Item 3 of the Immigration Control Act). Failing to file this notification can count against you in later extension and other reviews, and can also expose you to penalties.

---

Additional Notes on Extension Applications

Extension applications tend to be reviewed somewhat more leniently than first-time applications (COE or change of status). This is because you have a track record of having been approved once before.

How the period of stay steps up

The periods of stay for the spouse visa are, by law, 5 years, 3 years, 1 year, or 6 months. "6 months" is sometimes granted where there are doubts about the stability of the marriage (descriptions of granting practice are practical tendencies; the criteria for which period is granted have not been published).

In practice, the following step-up tendencies are observed (again, practical tendencies only):

• First grant — A 1-year period of stay is common (in some cases, 3 years is granted from the start)
• Second and subsequent renewals — If there are no problems, the period extends to 3 years
• Long-term stability — With a long, stable marriage, a 5-year period of stay is also possible

What extension reviews focus on

Extension applications focus on the following:

• Continuity of the marriage — Is the marital relationship still continuing soundly?
• Actual cohabitation — Are you actually living together?
• Fulfillment of public obligations — Are resident tax, pension, and health insurance payments being made properly?

Note that the delinquency-data linkage planned to start in June 2027, explained under Factor 5, is precisely a mechanism that feeds directly into these "extension and change" reviews. If your renewal is coming up, checking your payment status early is especially worthwhile.

---

Practical Information: Fees and Processing Times

Fees

• Certificate of Eligibility (COE) application — No fee
• Change of status of residence / extension of period of stay — Revised to ¥6,000 (¥5,500 for online applications) from April 1, 2025 (previously ¥4,000)

Outlook for fee revisions (as of July 2026)

On May 29, 2026, an amended Immigration Control Act raising the statutory ceilings on residence procedure fees was enacted (the ceiling for changes and extensions: ¥10,000 → ¥100,000). This much is confirmed fact.

The actual fee amounts will be set by Cabinet Order. On July 3, 2026, the ISA published a draft Cabinet Order adopting a tiered structure based on the period of stay, and a public comment period (until August 2) is underway. Under the draft, the fee for changes and extensions would be ¥10,000 for periods of stay of 3 months or less, ¥33,000 for 1 year, ¥64,000 for 3 years to under 5 years, and ¥75,000 for 5 years or more (with discounts for online applications in most tiers). Because the spouse visa is commonly granted with a 1-year period of stay at first, the "1 year" tier is the one relevant to most readers. Application is planned for applications accepted on or after October 1, 2026 — but the amounts and start date are currently only a draft, to be finalized by Cabinet Order after the public comment process. The draft also includes reduced fees for persons in financial hardship where humanitarian consideration is warranted.

There is no need to panic and "rush to apply before the increase." Compared with a rushed, underprepared application that ends in denial or requests for additional documents, getting approved once, cleanly, will save you both time and money in the end.

Typical processing times

In practice, COE applications generally take around 1–3 months, and changes/extensions around 1–2 months, though this varies with the complexity of the case and how busy the receiving office is (practical rules of thumb). The ISA publishes "residence examination processing times" quarterly; check there for the latest averages.

---

Summary: The 6 Review Factors

To recap the 6 factors examined in the spouse visa review:

1. Legal marriage — A legally established marriage is the absolute prerequisite. No applications based on de facto relationships
2. Immigration violation history — Deportation history (re-entry bans of 1 year / 5 years / 10 years in three tiers), overstay, unauthorized work, and criminal records are severe disadvantages
3. Authenticity of marriage — The most important factor. The ISA's prescribed "Questionnaire" and snapshot photos are the center of the review. Prove the course and depth of your relationship with objective evidence
4. Financial capacity — No codified monetary standard exists, but in practice household income of roughly ¥2,500,000 + ¥500,000 per dependent is the benchmark. Savings and an additional guarantor can compensate
5. Public obligations — Payment of taxes, pension, and health insurance has always been a review element. From June 2027, a mechanism directly linking delinquency data into screening is planned
6. Cohabitation — Living together is the principle. Long-term separation without a justifiable reason can even trigger revocation of the status

Understanding these factors, accurately grasping where you stand, and preparing thoroughly is the surest path to approval. If you have concerns, consider consulting a specialist such as an administrative scrivener handling immigration matters.

---

Disclaimer

This article provides general information and does not constitute legal advice. Status of residence reviews are decided case by case, and the information in this article may not apply to every situation. The system, fees, and screening practices may change in the future. For advice on your specific case, please consult a qualified specialist such as an administrative scrivener or attorney handling immigration matters.